It is necessary to present the destruction of "bourgeois" as a formation business - that is holding the money, and mental - that is, determining what to do with that money. Today's bourgeois does not constitute the formation of political formations such as the current does not create one - and that the death of the right policies. This is dangerous because the bourgeoisie, that because of available resources and flowing behind them "prestige," she manages to keep the upper areas of atomistic masses who make up today's "society." To stay on top has nothing to do with hierarchy, whose appearance is maintained with the help of empty forms and procedures, but the atavistic struggle for mutual extermination, survival and dominance.
In today's unreality, of course, can not speak of a stable social conditions, classes or groups, defined by a common distinguishing feature (cultural, ethnic, moral, professional) - and so the word "bourgeoisie" is only the top layer, the coating inert, formless acefalicznej social and carrion. It occupies a top position thanks to its easy access to material goods.
bourgeoisie means as much as middle class. These terms are its historical context, which can be used, however, and today. Today's citizens no longer need to characterize the right to live in - it was left spauperyzowanym the masses - but they are still closely associated with him. Online bourgeois rather live in the suburbs, in a semi-rural apartments - the city it serves only as a place of work and leisure, and therefore be taking money and its issuance. You can also put it conversely, that the suburbs are the "only" for the bedroom - in fact this is not of great importance because it is a townsman This same while the modern nomad. No ancestors, so they can dream up, it is not rooted anywhere, because he sees the same everywhere and is not necessarily attached to people, because they surround him everywhere. All deficiencies can catch the money they have in abundance. Why not move where it wants, and doing it often. With him moving and resources, it is only a carrier.
As a bourgeois / citizen can be anyone, saint and knight without fear and flaws at the same time, that's not counted in the utypowieniu. Is a representative sinister layers, giving tons of today's existence of countless masses of people, for which he did not want to assume responsibility. It is appropriate to amend the liberation of the masses as such does not aim to improve their position at all, but the transfer of specific freedoms and responsibilities of individuals, so that they were not dependent on anonymous tyranny of capital - of the total production and consumption, which are beyond the control of the real ( both because they belong to everyone and anyone, in fact, freely flowing world, just as information.)
Straight is to say: death burżujom, destroy the bourgeoisie. Is much harder to implement those terms. It is not even about the physical capabilities of this implementation, as they become available only at the next cracks of history. It is rather a psychological barrier, because to belong to the bourgeois world may also be our old friends, family members, etc.. We can not forget here that the concept is just a bourgeois figure, in an extremely easy way to spot possible in the current pstrokaciźnie social (political, economic, ...). In the current post-industrial era you just have to create such environment, which is itself the complement and the "human" arm of omnipotence materii.Stanie a bourgeois person could (and still can) be a random act, occurring only through blind trafowi. In our area after this recent occasion was, for example, political transformation, accompanied by the enfranchisement of the nomenclature - if by "from friend to friend" could enrich anybody, they still represent just a Who demoliberalnej support of the Republic of the Round Table. Quite recently I had something similar to western emigration European Union countries, through which any lout who work physically able to bring him back a few thousand euros, which then gave the injection of a local circulation of financial and after a couple of bourgeois rituals liźnięciu going into "society." Finally - the numberless opportunities of different lotteries, etc.. It is of course also mention the hard work of the unit, whose results can unfortunately lead to find themselves in the ranks of the System (as above: a person can be above reproach, and so this system is bad). The systems need not be criminal unless mention.
That's all today called "social promotion." It functions in the current (also global) set of relations, which clearly onslaught, so it must somehow be rejected.
do not want to theorize about the possibilities to deal with bourgeois set out in our environment, but only indicate the existence of that - how frequent - possibilities and born of her dilemma.
In an era of "Cities, weights, machines," the bourgeoisie itself seems to be invisible, embedded somewhere in their nests, and leaning out of them only for the production and consumption. Yes is indeed - and this is not a sign of its harmlessness, but it is a major, perhaps the most dangerous symptom of the domination of matter. It is inconceivable that the money the townspeople seem to use a primitive immersion in the superstructure. A man with less "happiness" from them, much wiser przeznaczyłby them to provide a stable base. Of course, the bourgeoisie its base are already assured, the One is the matter of their generous and meet some requests in accordance with the "spirit of the age" almost automatically, but would this generosity had its limits. It's not yet on a "Social justice" and "equal opportunities", but with an organic balance between spirit and matter, personal responsibility, and service life criteria. For now, will not easily expel citizens from their residences, because there's no real chance until they are over the material. Slowly, however, blurs the line between real and virtual worlds, the technical progress of rushing in all directions, once so somewhere between the modes has to sneak in some chaos, so that there was a gap between cyberspace and the need to support it matter, that these two areas would begin with each bite, and eventually died dead in a deadly embrace. Then the surface will again be able to show the force, and again develop the material and moral wasteland.
In historical reasons attempts to cope with the bourgeoisie was really a lot of what expressive design of these ideas were revolutionary left. Looking at the present, but these attempts were unsuccessful - in fact, were taken from groups wishing to have access to the same matter and establish its domination in its own way, must therefore lead the current state of affairs, a progressive accumulation of old currents, up to a seemingly unprecedented autometamorfozy and the transition from industrial to post-industrial era - or the deliberate blurring of shapes and physical properties of the dominant matter to us. Today's system is based on the flow of services and information, of course, interpreted as a kind of goods. You can even say that it had to be, because reaching the reign of the matter is always develops according to your needs is what we came to be called "bourgeois." He knows it is not just capitalism, after the necessary time physically well institutionalized Socialism has developed its forms. On through the convergence of (technical and mental) and globalization of local varieties of fused together and now you can not predict what it will end.
can only hope that the totalitarian rule of the matter, which appears to be necessary for some time before the beginning of the end of everything, leading to its collapse - for the simple reason that it embraces everything, and so because of their ubiquity and the ability to lose the right further expansion, domination and eventually being.
Anarchorewolucjonista
